<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dimeadrink.org &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dimeadrink.org/category/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dimeadrink.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Music Mixer</title>
		<link>http://www.dimeadrink.org/music-mixer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dimeadrink.org/music-mixer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio mixers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music mixer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimeadrink.org/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A large amount of my friends were extremely disappointed in me when I ultimately switched over to digital machine. In fact, they are all garage rock snobs. If you need to have a rough and raw sound, you can do that on digital machine just as simply as with analog gear.
It&#8217;s not like you need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A large amount of my friends were extremely disappointed in me when I ultimately switched over to <a href="http://www.dimeadrink.org" target="_blank">digital machine</a>. In fact, they are all garage rock snobs. If you need to have a rough and raw sound, you can do that on digital machine just as simply as with analog gear.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like you need to make everything sound processed if you don&#8217;t wish to.</p>
<p>Still, having good audio mixers and receivers permit you to do just that if you&#8217;d like to.</p>
<p>However , I was pretty used to using my analog audio mixer gear. It took a fair bit of time and money to line up a new audio recording studio. It isn&#8217;t especially prime quality, but I know ways to modify it to get just the right sound.</p>
<p>It is hard to become used to something so clean and exact. I have more control over the music than ever. I could even see on the digital readout how strong a signal was going thru. All of a sudden , I&#8217;m able to not do things by touch any more.</p>
<p>I have to actually know the level that I need as a number. It was regarded as an enormous change for me, but one that I have coped with pretty well. Naturally, the audio mixer is just one part of getting a good pro audio setup. Effects that used to need a specific recording round to line up, thousands of greenbacks of hardware, and specialized mics can now be simulated with a great degree of accuracy in most audio recording software. In the final analysis, it is worth the effort to catch up with the new technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dimeadrink.org/music-mixer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>974</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
